Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 15:41
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why does my ex boyfriend do this?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
FDA approves HIV drug based on University of Utah biochemist's findings - KSL News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Harvard study warns: Common napping habits linked to higher death risk - Times of India
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
10 quotes about science’s value to society - Big Think
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The #1 Breakfast to Eat to Support Your Metabolism, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Over a million people now have access to the gen-AI powered Alexa+ - TechCrunch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?